Jump to content

Image Bug: Difference between revisions

From CPCWiki - THE Amstrad CPC encyclopedia!
Nocash (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(16 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
[[Category:Wiki]]
= What Links Here Bug =
Below demonstrates that pages that link via ''':Image:Filename''' aren't shown in the '''File links''' section of the corresponding files page.
This is a pretty serious bug, as people may delete such files, believing that they aren't used.
* [[:Image:ACU8612001.jpg]] - link to ":Image:Filename" - does '''still not''' work ('''not''' shown at http://cpcwiki.eu/index.php/File:ACU8612001.jpg)
* [[Media:ACU8612002.jpg]] - link to "Media:Filename" - works (shown at http://cpcwiki.eu/index.php/File:ACU8612002.jpg)
That is, correct would be the page "Image Bug" being shown in the "File links" section of both jpg's. It is however shown only in the "File links" section of the second jpg.
= GIF Bug =
Test page showing the GIF bug in cpcwiki. If it is a bug... or is it a subtle anti-compuserve campaign...?
Test page showing the GIF bug in cpcwiki. If it is a bug... or is it a subtle anti-compuserve campaign...?


Line 9: Line 23:
[[File:NoPicture.gif|100px|left]]
[[File:NoPicture.gif|100px|left]]
* '''GIF 100px''' - black colors are lost during resampling
* '''GIF 100px''' - black colors are lost during resampling
* With Opera: Black is completely invisble (=white)
* Interestingly, black is displayed as TRANSPARENT color (showing the webpage's background color; which depends on the cpcwiki style used)
* With Firefox: Black is very-very pale (=almost white / bright gray)
* See http://cpcwiki.eu/index.php?title=Image_Bug&useskin=monobook (white background)
* See http://cpcwiki.eu/index.php?title=Image_Bug&useskin=gumaxv (pale blue background)
<br style="clear:both;">
<br style="clear:both;">


Line 28: Line 43:
* '''GIF full'''
* '''GIF full'''
<br style="clear:both;">
<br style="clear:both;">
== wikipedia ==
Another example of the GIF problem. Observe that wikipedia DOES show the same imapge properly (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Columbia_River_Knife_%26_Tool).
<gallery>
File:TestImage1bppOutburst open.gif|old upload
File:TestImage1bppOutburst open new upload.gif|new upload (same file, but now looks worse!)
</gallery>
Sorry about the martial looking example, it was the first file found on wikipedia when searching for "gif schematic" being shown in a gallery.
== history ==
The gif image bug dates back (at least) to 2007, unwanted transparency was reported here http://cpcwiki.eu/forum/index.php/topic,72.msg461.html#msg461 will that ever be fixed?

Latest revision as of 19:46, 17 December 2010

What Links Here Bug

Below demonstrates that pages that link via :Image:Filename aren't shown in the File links section of the corresponding files page.

This is a pretty serious bug, as people may delete such files, believing that they aren't used.

That is, correct would be the page "Image Bug" being shown in the "File links" section of both jpg's. It is however shown only in the "File links" section of the second jpg.

GIF Bug

Test page showing the GIF bug in cpcwiki. If it is a bug... or is it a subtle anti-compuserve campaign...?

Below GIF and PNG are pixel-identical images, but, the GIF is shown correctly only in fullsize, but not when resampled to smaller sizes.

100px

Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination
  • PNG 100px - okay


Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination


Fullsize

Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination
  • PNG full


Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination
  • GIF full


wikipedia

Another example of the GIF problem. Observe that wikipedia DOES show the same imapge properly (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Columbia_River_Knife_%26_Tool).

Sorry about the martial looking example, it was the first file found on wikipedia when searching for "gif schematic" being shown in a gallery.

history

The gif image bug dates back (at least) to 2007, unwanted transparency was reported here http://cpcwiki.eu/forum/index.php/topic,72.msg461.html#msg461 will that ever be fixed?