Talk:Prodatrons' first demos - Revision history

Gryzor at 18:04, 28 September 2006

2006-09-28T18:04:36Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:04, 28 September 2006
Line 5:		Line 5:
	:: Exactly what I'm saying - but it seems you understood the exact opposite? All I'm saying it, I don't think it's worth it having a separate page for "first demos". It's not like we're talking about Michelangelo's early years :D It'd be better if all releases were in one article - then a section could be "First Demos", but not a separate article! [[User:Gryzor\|Gryzor]] 09:54, 28 September 2006 (CEST)		:: Exactly what I'm saying - but it seems you understood the exact opposite? All I'm saying it, I don't think it's worth it having a separate page for "first demos". It's not like we're talking about Michelangelo's early years :D It'd be better if all releases were in one article - then a section could be "First Demos", but not a separate article! [[User:Gryzor\|Gryzor]] 09:54, 28 September 2006 (CEST)

	::: I would suggest the opposite. I think it is important to give every demo its own article. After all this site is going to be a all things CPC related. I think its not a question if the demo is worth it or not(Let the reader decide! :-)) Also in this way it would be easy to expand with categories in the future - to make crude statistics. For example: put at category tag on every on every demo page: For example "DEMO 1992" to see all demos created in 1992 or put a "PLUSFEATURE" to see all demos that has CPC+ features!		::: I would suggest the opposite. I think it is important to give every demo its own article. After all this site is going to be a all things CPC related. I think its not a question if the demo is worth it or not(Let the reader decide! :-)) Also in this way it would be easy to expand with categories in the future - to make crude statistics. For example: put at category tag on every on every demo page: For example "DEMO 1992" to see all demos created in 1992 or put a "PLUSFEATURE" to see all demos that has CPC+ features! --[[User:CPCLER\|CPCLER]] 10:27, 28 September 2006 (CEST)
	--[[User:CPCLER\|CPCLER]] 10:27, 28 September 2006 (CEST)
			:::: Um, it's not an issue of the site being "all thing CPC related" (thanks for reminding!). It's a matter of organizing content. And it is an issue of whether a demo is worth it or not (plus, I'm a reader and I decide, no?). Maybe the very tops of demos are worth separate articles (and then probably not written by their programmers ;) ), but create an article for every single demo? Mnnnahhhhh... [[User:Gryzor\|Gryzor]] 20:04, 28 September 2006 (CEST)

CPCLER at 08:27, 28 September 2006

2006-09-28T08:27:24Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:27, 28 September 2006
Line 4:		Line 4:

	:: Exactly what I'm saying - but it seems you understood the exact opposite? All I'm saying it, I don't think it's worth it having a separate page for "first demos". It's not like we're talking about Michelangelo's early years :D It'd be better if all releases were in one article - then a section could be "First Demos", but not a separate article! [[User:Gryzor\|Gryzor]] 09:54, 28 September 2006 (CEST)		:: Exactly what I'm saying - but it seems you understood the exact opposite? All I'm saying it, I don't think it's worth it having a separate page for "first demos". It's not like we're talking about Michelangelo's early years :D It'd be better if all releases were in one article - then a section could be "First Demos", but not a separate article! [[User:Gryzor\|Gryzor]] 09:54, 28 September 2006 (CEST)

			::: I would suggest the opposite. I think it is important to give every demo its own article. After all this site is going to be a all things CPC related. I think its not a question if the demo is worth it or not(Let the reader decide! :-)) Also in this way it would be easy to expand with categories in the future - to make crude statistics. For example: put at category tag on every on every demo page: For example "DEMO 1992" to see all demos created in 1992 or put a "PLUSFEATURE" to see all demos that has CPC+ features!
			--[[User:CPCLER\|CPCLER]] 10:27, 28 September 2006 (CEST)

Gryzor at 07:54, 28 September 2006

2006-09-28T07:54:39Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:54, 28 September 2006
Line 2:		Line 2:

	: Hm, I think they are nothing special, so three single articles wouldn't make sense. -- [[User:Prodatron\|Prodatron]] 17:03, 27 September 2006 (CEST)		: Hm, I think they are nothing special, so three single articles wouldn't make sense. -- [[User:Prodatron\|Prodatron]] 17:03, 27 September 2006 (CEST)

			:: Exactly what I'm saying - but it seems you understood the exact opposite? All I'm saying it, I don't think it's worth it having a separate page for "first demos". It's not like we're talking about Michelangelo's early years :D It'd be better if all releases were in one article - then a section could be "First Demos", but not a separate article! [[User:Gryzor\|Gryzor]] 09:54, 28 September 2006 (CEST)

Prodatron at 15:03, 27 September 2006

2006-09-27T15:03:52Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:03, 27 September 2006
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I think this does not need a separate page - first demos, later demos etc... why not pull it all under one article? [[User:Gryzor\|Gryzor]] 06:54, 27 September 2006 (CEST)		I think this does not need a separate page - first demos, later demos etc... why not pull it all under one article? [[User:Gryzor\|Gryzor]] 06:54, 27 September 2006 (CEST)

			: Hm, I think they are nothing special, so three single articles wouldn't make sense. -- [[User:Prodatron\|Prodatron]] 17:03, 27 September 2006 (CEST)

Gryzor at 04:54, 27 September 2006

2006-09-27T04:54:55Z

New page

I think this does not need a separate page - first demos, later demos etc... why not pull it all under one article? [[User:Gryzor|Gryzor]] 06:54, 27 September 2006 (CEST)