Amstrad Commercials - Revision history

Gryzor: /* CPC related */

2010-03-28T07:30:24Z

CPC related

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:30, 28 March 2010
Line 50:		Line 50:
	{{#ev:youtube\|Zo7jnQXvtNo\|300}}		{{#ev:youtube\|Zo7jnQXvtNo\|300}}

	~~Of course,~~ the ~~Amstrad~~ CPC464 ~~loose by far as~~ the BBC ~~micro~~ was ~~owned~~ by the BBC~~... just like~~ the ~~channel broadcasting this programm~~.		It comes as no surprise that the CPC464 lost to the BBC. The BBC was, of course, commissioned and promoted by the BBC, so that the criteria used were biased in favor of the Acorn machine.

	~~It was clearly cheated with~~ the "this ~~old junk BBC do have more softwares than the brand~~ new ~~released Amstrad" argument~~. ~~As this granted an awfull lot of "points" compaired to others tests~~ the ~~Amstrad won by far.~~		For instance, they overplayed the software quantity point; but this would leave any new machine fighting an uphill fight. Also, the graphical capabilities were not protrayed accurately, maybe because they were not fully understood.

	~~The Graphical~~ capabilities ~~was a bit cheated too. The CPC could display twice maximum colours (16) despite in large pixels mode.~~

	~~The Fullscreen trick wasn't quite known at the time despite enabling Amstrad's CPC to really get a resolution comparable to BBC's~~.

2010-03-22T10:22:15Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:22, 22 March 2010
Line 65:		Line 65:
	German videos featuring a Schneider CPC....		German videos featuring a Schneider CPC....

	[[Category:CPC History]][[Category:Video contents]]		[[Category:CPC History]][[Category:Video contents\| ]]

2010-03-22T10:21:53Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:21, 22 March 2010
Line 59:		Line 59:


			{{#ev:youtube\|xPNwD-KVAVU\|300}}
			{{#ev:youtube\|Nt1UJrzPmyc\|300}}
			{{#ev:youtube\|41ZORB3sxJ4\|300}}

			German videos featuring a Schneider CPC....

	[[Category:CPC History]][[Category:Video contents]]		[[Category:CPC History]][[Category:Video contents]]

2010-03-22T08:58:37Z

2010-03-20T10:42:20Z

@@ Line 7: / Line 7: @@
 {{#ev:youtube|x2NG7vnon7k|300}}
-[[File:Dailymotion - Pub Amstrad PC 1512 - une vido Jeux vido.h26.mp4]]
-[[http://cpcwiki.eu/imgs/6/62/Dailymotion_-_Pub_Amstrad_PC_1512_-_une_vido_Jeux_vido.h26.mp4]]
+==Amstrad CPC french Ads==
 == CPC related ==

2010-03-18T07:24:39Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:24, 18 March 2010
Line 6:		Line 6:

	{{#ev:youtube\|x2NG7vnon7k\|300}}		{{#ev:youtube\|x2NG7vnon7k\|300}}

			[[File:Dailymotion - Pub Amstrad PC 1512 - une vido Jeux vido.h26.mp4]]
			[[http://cpcwiki.eu/imgs/6/62/Dailymotion_-_Pub_Amstrad_PC_1512_-_une_vido_Jeux_vido.h26.mp4]]

	== CPC related ==		== CPC related ==

2009-12-26T03:36:52Z

CPC related

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:36, 26 December 2009
Line 16:		Line 16:
	It was clearly cheated with the "this old junk BBC do have more softwares than the brand new released Amstrad" argument. As this granted an awfull lot of "points" compaired to others tests the Amstrad won by far.		It was clearly cheated with the "this old junk BBC do have more softwares than the brand new released Amstrad" argument. As this granted an awfull lot of "points" compaired to others tests the Amstrad won by far.

	The Graphical capabilities was a bit cheated too. The CPC ~~did have a better palette of 27~~ colours (16 ~~for the BBC~~) ~~and could display twice colours~~ in large pixels mode.		The Graphical capabilities was a bit cheated too. The CPC could display twice maximum colours (16) despite in large pixels mode.

	The Fullscreen trick wasn't quite known at the time despite enabling Amstrad's CPC to really get a resolution comparable to BBC's.		The Fullscreen trick wasn't quite known at the time despite enabling Amstrad's CPC to really get a resolution comparable to BBC's.

2009-12-26T03:22:24Z

CPC related

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:22, 26 December 2009
Line 11:		Line 11:

	{{#ev:youtube\|Zo7jnQXvtNo\|300}}		{{#ev:youtube\|Zo7jnQXvtNo\|300}}

			Of course, the Amstrad CPC464 loose by far as the BBC micro was owned by the BBC... just like the channel broadcasting this programm.

			It was clearly cheated with the "this old junk BBC do have more softwares than the brand new released Amstrad" argument. As this granted an awfull lot of "points" compaired to others tests the Amstrad won by far.

			The Graphical capabilities was a bit cheated too. The CPC did have a better palette of 27 colours (16 for the BBC) and could display twice colours in large pixels mode.

			The Fullscreen trick wasn't quite known at the time despite enabling Amstrad's CPC to really get a resolution comparable to BBC's.




	[[Category:CPC History]][[Category:Video contents]]		[[Category:CPC History]][[Category:Video contents]]

2009-12-26T02:59:31Z

CPC related

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:59, 26 December 2009
Line 9:		Line 9:
	== CPC related ==		== CPC related ==

	~~{{#ev:youtube\|Ut_KSHgi4e0\|300}}~~

	~~http~~:~~//www.~~youtube~~.com/watch?v=~~Zo7jnQXvtNo		{{#ev:youtube\|Zo7jnQXvtNo\|300}}


	[[Category:CPC History]][[Category:Video contents]]		[[Category:CPC History]][[Category:Video contents]]

2009-12-26T02:58:11Z

CPC related

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:58, 26 December 2009
Line 10:		Line 10:

	{{#ev:youtube\|Ut_KSHgi4e0\|300}}		{{#ev:youtube\|Ut_KSHgi4e0\|300}}

			http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zo7jnQXvtNo

	[[Category:CPC History]][[Category:Video contents]]		[[Category:CPC History]][[Category:Video contents]]